Legal expert Sergey Zhorin discussed the distinction between public…
Legal expert Sergey Zhorin discussed the distinction between public criticism and criminal threats against the creators of the film 'The Last Hero: Kolobok,' stating that while harsh criticism is permissible, specific threats of murder or serious harm may lead to criminal liability if proven. Authorities have been alerted to anonymous threats made against the film's director and actors.
Consensus
- Public criticism of the film 'The Last Hero: Kolobok' is legally permissible.
- Threats of murder or serious harm to the film's creators may constitute a criminal offense under Article 119, Part 2 of the Russian Criminal Code.
- The legal system must determine whether specific messages cross the line from criticism to criminal threats.
- Authorities, including the prosecutor's office and the Investigative Committee, have been notified of anonymous threats against the film's director and actors.
- If proven, criminal liability could result in up to five years of imprisonment, though conditional sentences are more common in similar cases.
Points of divergence
- The expert emphasized that the state must respond to threats, highlighting the need for a clear legal boundary between rough speech and criminal threats. — gazeta_spb
Coverage (2 sources)
- Lawyer assessed risk of prison for threats to creators of 'Kolkob' — РИАМО
- In the scandal around the film 'Koloobok', a line was drawn between criticism and threats - SPb Gazeta - St. Petersburg news — Gazeta.SPb