Prince Harry lost a lawsuit against The Daily Mail regarding the… (принц · гарри · суд)

Prince Harry lost a lawsuit against The Daily Mail regarding the case of his phone being tapped by the newspaper.

Consensus

Prince Harry lost the lawsuit against Associated Newspapers, publisher of Daily Mail.
The High Court in London rejected all 97 claims brought by Prince Harry and other celebrities.
Judge Matthew Nicholls ruled that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the allegations.
The case involved accusations that Daily Mail obtained private information through illegal means such as phone tapping and surveillance between 1993 and 2011.
Other public figures, including Elton John, Elizabeth Hurley, and Sadie Frost, joined Prince Harry in the lawsuit.
Associated Newspapers claimed they obtained information from legitimate sources close to the individuals involved.

Prince Harry was allowed to stay at Buckingham Palace during his visit to the UK, which is unrelated to the court case. — vesti
The High Court dismissed the case due to lack of facts and stated that journalists' sources were credible in each instance. — vm
Judge Matthew Nicholls emphasized that it is not acceptable for courts to assume illegal sourcing simply because a company cannot explain how information was obtained. — kommersant
Prince Harry became emotional during his testimony, nearly crying in court, and described the legal process as traumatic and repetitive of past experiences with the press. — m24