Roskachestvo tested 20 charging devices and found safety violations…
Roskachestvo tested 20 charging devices and found safety violations in 13 of them, posing risks of electric shock, fire, and electromagnetic interference. The report highlighted issues with insulation, flammable materials, lead content, and inaccurate labeling across multiple brands.
Consensus
- Roskachestvo tested 20 chargers from different brands.
- 13 out of 20 chargers had safety violations that pose risks of electric shock or fire.
- The testing was based on 37 quality, safety, and labeling criteria.
- B Y Original, GQbox, Hoco, Digma, Flarx, Borofone, and Borasco failed the electrical insulation test.
- These brands (except Borasco) used flammable plastic, increasing fire risk.
- Flarx chargers contained excessive lead in cable insulation, violating chemical safety standards.
- B Y Original, GQbox, Hoco,Borofone, Keyron, Borasco,Apple,Digma, and Flarx created high electromagnetic interference.
- 10 out of 20 brands had incomplete or inaccurate information on packaging and instructions.
- There is a direct link between price and safety: devices under 800 rubles were more likely to have critical violations.
- Roskachestvo recommended buying chargers for at least 900 rubles from reputable retailers.
Points of divergence
- Only seven devices (Ugreen, Anker, Qilive,Basus, Realme,Xiaomi, Commo) were tested — representing 35% of the total test volume. — vesti
- Devices in the premium segment (over 1200 rubles) showed flawless results except for Apple and Samsung, which had issues with electromagnetic compatibility and labeling respectively. — vedomosti
Coverage (2 sources)
- Roskachestvo identified safety issues in 13 of 20 tested charging devices — Вести
- Roskachestvo: 13 of 20 charging devices are unsafe for users — Ведомости