Legal victories are politically motivated attacks on conservative figures (Правовые победы являются политически мотивированными атаками на консервативных фигур)
This narrative frames high-profile legal cases involving conservative figures like Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein as part of a coordinated political attack by liberal institutions, rather than as outcomes of legitimate judicial processes. It selectively omits key facts that contradict this framing, such as the role of prosecutorial discretion, prior convictions, and the broader context of legal proceedings. The narrative also employs ad-hominem attacks by characterizing the legal system as biased and the plaintiffs as opportunistic, while presenting the defendants as victims of a 'liberal…
Member events
- трамп, кэрролл, суд, сексуальный, джина, апелляция
- вайнштейн, суд, приговор, судья, изнасилование, срок
Recurring omissions
- The Manhattan-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict in 2024
- Evidence established a 'repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct' consistent with Carroll's allegations
- Trump's lawyers argued that the trial judge 'erroneously allowed testimony about multiple decades-old, unverified and unrelated allegations to be presented to the jury'
- Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said the Supreme Court's decision 'affirms once and for all the jury's unanimous verdict'
- Trump's Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation targeting Carroll
- Carroll sued Trump in federal court in Manhattan
- Jury did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed
- Trump's lawyers accused Ms Carroll of wanting to profit off the lawsuit
- Trump called the case 'weaponization and lawfare case'
- Trump said the case was 'really against the United States of America, and all it stands for'